Moving Back

In Cambridge again,

The blissful presence of the lake

Now accessible through memory alone.

My surroundings now, even empty,

Are full of what they might contain

Implied by how they are designed for that containment.

Roads, sidewalks, buildings,

The trappings that make their roles possible,

Wires, signs, signals

And groups of people

Police, city officials, property owners

Designating and constraining use

And shaping meaning.

The lake’s limitless horizons

The mountains, boulders

And even the small rocks

Are revelatory of the forces

Beyond our control

That brought about them—and us.

But those forces have too limited a presence

In our lives here in the city.

On reflection one can sense

What underlies the urban artifact:

The waterways, the topography,

Insistent outcroppings of rock

Slopes impossible to inhabit,

But also its strategic location

In the larger landscape

And ultimately the kinds and qualities of lives

It affords and the roles it can play.

At best there could be a melding

Of nature and intent,

Where the city could inspire,

Beyond the necessary purposes it must fulfill,

A more profound way to build on

Nature’s forces, strength, and beauty

While enabling the gathering of people and lives

To reach even more satisfying

Levels of achievement

And ways of being.

One Response to “Moving Back”

  1. Susie Cross's avatar Susie Cross Says:

    This is stunning Bill. It touched me deeply, as someone who has also fallen in love with lake and mountains and vistas, not to mention, the trees and creatures. The contrast of our more urban life can be stark and challenging at times. I enjoy the way that you talk about the urban artifact and envision the possibility of melding nature and (human) intent in more beautiful, meaningful and satisfying ways within an urban landscape. Ways that invite our being, not just our doing!

Leave a comment